Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen? Or
>> is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now?
>
> I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said
> something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on
> IRC at some point later. :)
locking/kcsan is not the problem (it just has more fixes on top)
core/rcu is the one which diverged and caused the merge conflict with
PPC to happen twice. So Paul needs to remove the stale core/rcu bits and
rebase on the current version (which is not going to change again).
Thanks,
tglx
