On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:54:13PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote: > > > On 5/18/20 5:47 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:36:26PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > > > > On May 14, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Fair enough! And yes, the Linux kernel is quite large, so I certainly am > > > > not asking you to test the whole thing yourself. > > > Ok, I saw 0day bot also started to report those which is good. For example, > > > > > > lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/12/1358 > > > > > > which so far is nit blocking 0day on linux-next since it does not use panic_on_warn yet (while syzbot does). > > > > > > Thus, I am more convinced that we should not revert the commit just for syzbot until someone could also convince 0day to select RCU_EXPERT and then DEBUG_RCU_LIST? > > Let's ask the 0day people, now CCed, if they would be willing to > > build with CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_LIST=y on some > > fraction of their testing. ;-) > > > > Thanx, Paul > > Hi, > > Thanks for your advice, we'll support it in the near future. Thank you very much! Thanx, Paul
