On 5/18/20 5:47 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:36:26PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
On May 14, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fair enough! And yes, the Linux kernel is quite large, so I certainly am
not asking you to test the whole thing yourself.
Ok, I saw 0day bot also started to report those which is good. For example,
lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/12/1358
which so far is nit blocking 0day on linux-next since it does not use panic_on_warn yet (while syzbot does).
Thus, I am more convinced that we should not revert the commit just for syzbot until someone could also convince 0day to select RCU_EXPERT and then DEBUG_RCU_LIST?
Let's ask the 0day people, now CCed, if they would be willing to
build with CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_LIST=y on some
fraction of their testing. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
Hi,
Thanks for your advice, we'll support it in the near future.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
