Hi Arjun, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:34:48 -0800 Arjun Roy <arjunroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Agreed on sparc64; I think the sparc32 patch ought to be reverted, > though (since pte_index may be meaningless to it). Agreed. I will replace the sparc32 patch with your new ones in today's linux-next. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpI6C5VndgU3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
