Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:36:49 +0530
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20191211142100.423ef8b0@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20191211142100.423ef8b0@canb.auug.org.au>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52

On 11-12-19, 14:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   dfb3f45d17b6 ("cpufreq: scmi: Match scmi device by both name and protocol id")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Fixed, thanks.

-- 
viresh

References:
- linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: next/master build: 214 builds: 1 failed, 213 passed, 2 errors, 58 warnings (next-20191211)
Next by Date: next/master boot: 293 boots: 88 failed, 188 passed with 8 offline, 6 untried/unknown, 3 conflicts (next-20191211)
Previous by thread: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
Next by thread: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux