Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/22/19 11:44 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 8:17 AM Shaokun Zhang
> <zhangshaokun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +Cc: Mark Salyzyn
>>
>> There is a compiler failure on arm64 platform, as follow:
>> zhangshaokun@ubuntu:~/linux-next$ make -j64
>>   CALL    scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
>>   CC      arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
>> In file included from ./include/linux/sysctl.h:30:0,
>>                  from ./include/linux/umh.h:9,
>>                  from ./include/linux/kmod.h:9,
>>                  from ./include/linux/module.h:13,
>>                  from ./include/linux/acpi.h:29,
>>                  from ./include/acpi/apei.h:9,
>>                  from ./include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
>>                  from ./include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
>>                  from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>> ./include/uapi/linux/sysctl.h:561:29: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘}’ before ‘__attribute__’
>>   NET_IPV6_TEMP_PREFERED_LFT __attribute__((deprecated)) = /* NOTYPO */
>>                              ^
>> scripts/Makefile.build:99: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed
>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>> Makefile:1108: recipe for target 'prepare0' failed
>> make: *** [prepare0] Error 2
>>
>> It's the commit <79f0cf35dccb> ("treewide: cleanup: replace prefered with preferred").
> 
> After receiving a report from kisskb for failures for m68k, looking at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/f3c452cfc59c817950b150b51ec2b33409d7640b/
> and doing some testing, it looks like this construct is supported by gcc-7
> and gcc-8, but not by gcc-4.6.3 and gcc-5. Don't know about gcc-6.

I guess that's a different problem than the misspelled PREFERED before the __attribute__.

-- 
~Randy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux