> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 11:33 PM > To: Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@xxxxxxx> > Cc: shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kuldeep Singh > <kuldeep.singh@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add ls2080a > compatibility string to bindings > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 06:19:53AM +0000, Ashish Kumar wrote: > > > For Patch-2, I intended to use this in arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl- > ls1088a.dtsi (please see below), since both ls1088 and ls2080 has same QSPI > controller. > > So I had introduced new compatible > > + "fsl,ls1012a-qspi" followed by "fsl,ls1021a-qspi" > > + "fsl,ls1088a-qspi" followed by "fsl,ls2080a-qspi" > > Even if the compatible is supposed to be used in conjunction with other > fallbacks it should still explicitly be there in case someone forgets or decides > not to do that for some reason. Thanks Mark, I will update the spi-fsl-qspi.c to include ls1088, ls1012 in driver data. Regards Ashish
