> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 4:37 PM
> To: Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add ls2080a
> compatibility string to bindings
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:53:09PM +0530, Ashish Kumar wrote:
>
> > There are 2 version of QSPI-IP, according to which controller
> > registers sets can be big endian or little endian.There are some other
> > minor changes like RX fifo depth etc.
> >
> > The big endian version uses driver compatible "fsl,ls1021a-qspi" and
> > little endian version uses driver compatible "fsl,ls2080a-qspi"
>
> I'm not seeing the corresponding code changes anywhere? I'd at least
> expect to see the compatibles added, and it sounds like some actual code
> updates are needed.
Hi Mark,
Snippet from driver spi-fsl-qspi.c
static const struct of_device_id fsl_qspi_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,vf610-qspi", .data = &vybrid_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-qspi", .data = &imx6sx_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx7d-qspi", .data = &imx7d_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6ul-qspi", .data = &imx6ul_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-qspi", .data = &ls1021a_data, },
{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-qspi", .data = &ls2080a_data, },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
I had previously sent dts patch based out of Shawn's tree with dependency on these dt binding patch. To which Shawn had replied to get dependency patch accepted first before sending this dts change.
Reference conversion can be viewed here [1],[2].
This compatible can be seen here: file arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi
Snippet from previous dts patch based on Shawn tree, I will send next version on this patch after dt-bindings are updated
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi
index d7e78dcd153d..8e5ba513b24f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls208xa.dtsi
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@
qspi: spi@20c0000 {
status = "disabled";
- compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-qspi", "fsl,ls1021a-qspi";
+ compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-qspi";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg = <0x0 0x20c0000 0x0 0x10000>,
>
> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This makes it
> easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Could you please guide more, or point to documentation to follow sub-system style.
dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add ls2080a-qspi compatibility string to bindings
Is this a better now? if yes, I will send next version
[1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg727403.html
[2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10192103/
Regards
Ashish
