Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] mpls: don't build sysctl related code when sysctl is disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/7/19 12:20 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> This would explain why so much code went under the #ifdef.
> Should we select or depend on sysctl maybe?

I think so



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux