Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] mpls: don't build sysctl related code when sysctl is disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/6/19 6:36 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> Some sysctl related code and data structures is never referenced
> when CONFIG_SYSCTL is not set.
> While this is usually harmless, it produces a build failure since sysctl
> shared variables exists, due to missing sysctl_vals symbol:
> 
>     ld: net/mpls/af_mpls.o: in function `mpls_platform_labels':
>     af_mpls.c:(.text+0x162a): undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
>     ld: net/mpls/af_mpls.o:(.rodata+0x830): undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
>     ld: net/mpls/af_mpls.o:(.rodata+0x838): undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
>     ld: net/mpls/af_mpls.o:(.rodata+0x870): undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
> 
> Fix this by moving all sysctl related code under #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2: fix a crash on netns destroy
> 
>  net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 207 insertions(+), 186 deletions(-)
> 

As I recall you need to set platform_labels for the mpls code to even
work, so building mpls_router without sysctl is pointless.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux