On 2019/4/17 22:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>>>
>>> fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'f2fs_remove_inode_page':
>>> fs/f2fs/node.c:1193:47: warning: format '%zu' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 5 has type 'blkcnt_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
>>> "Inconsistent i_blocks, ino:%lu, iblocks:%zu",
>>> ~~^
>>> %llu
>>> inode->i_ino, inode->i_blocks);
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Could you please help to fix that as below in your dev branch directly?
>>
>> "Inconsistent i_blocks, ino:%lu, iblocks:%llu",
>
> We can just use "%lu"?
We'd better follow sample in Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst:
If <type> is dependent on a config option for its size (e.g., sector_t,
blkcnt_t) or is architecture-dependent for its size (e.g., tcflag_t), use a
format specifier of its largest possible type and explicitly cast to it.
Example::
printk("test: sector number/total blocks: %llu/%llu\n",
(unsigned long long)sector, (unsigned long long)blockcount);
Thanks,
>
>> inode->i_ino, (unsigned long long)inode->i_blocks)
>>
>>
>> It looks that we need to fix below commits as well:
>>
>> f2fs: fix to avoid panic in dec_valid_block_count()
>> f2fs: fix to avoid panic in dec_valid_node_count()
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Introduced by commit
>>>
>>> 90ae238d9dac ("f2fs: fix to avoid panic in f2fs_remove_inode_page()")
>>>
>>> from the f2fs tree interacting with commit
>>>
>>> 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF")
>>>
> .
>
