On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2019/4/17 10:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'f2fs_remove_inode_page':
> > fs/f2fs/node.c:1193:47: warning: format '%zu' expects argument of type 'size_t', but argument 5 has type 'blkcnt_t' {aka 'long long unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
> > "Inconsistent i_blocks, ino:%lu, iblocks:%zu",
> > ~~^
> > %llu
> > inode->i_ino, inode->i_blocks);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Could you please help to fix that as below in your dev branch directly?
>
> "Inconsistent i_blocks, ino:%lu, iblocks:%llu",
We can just use "%lu"?
> inode->i_ino, (unsigned long long)inode->i_blocks)
>
>
> It looks that we need to fix below commits as well:
>
> f2fs: fix to avoid panic in dec_valid_block_count()
> f2fs: fix to avoid panic in dec_valid_node_count()
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Introduced by commit
> >
> > 90ae238d9dac ("f2fs: fix to avoid panic in f2fs_remove_inode_page()")
> >
> > from the f2fs tree interacting with commit
> >
> > 72deb455b5ec ("block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF")
> >
