On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 14:50:59 +0200 Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06.09.2018 18:42, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I've attached a quick fix that should address both problems. I'd > >> appreciate if this patch could get some testing before I post proper fix > >> patches. > > > > Hmm, I'm still not able to reproduce it on powerpc cross build even with > > CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION=y ... So, sorry I couldn't test this patch. > > Maybe this is related to the compiler/binutils versions used. I'm using > Fedora 28's gcc-powerpc64 and binutils-powerpc64 packages: > > powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170622 (Red Hat Cross 7.1.1-3) > GNU ld version 2.29.1-4.fc28 > > For reference I'm also attaching the config that I used to reproduce the > problem on kernel v4.18. > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.h b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.h > >> index ae5fdff18406..2ca33277a28b 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.h > >> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ > >> > >> #define ARM_DISCARD \ > >> *(.ARM.exidx.exit.text) \ > >> + *(.ARM.exidx.text.exit) \ > > > > BTW, why would we need this? > > That's necessary to fix one of the two ARM linker failures reported via > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/24/345 > > >>> `.text.exit' referenced in section `.ARM.exidx.text.exit' of > >>> kernel/trace/trace_clock.o: defined in discarded section `.text.exit' > >>> of kernel/trace/trace_clock.o > > Section ".ARM.exidx.text.exit" refers to ".text.exit" which was > discarded. With the change above, the extraneous section > ".ARM.exidx.text.exit" is also discarded, resolving the linker failure. OK, so your patch fixes following issue too? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10584685/ In that case, we should drop above patch. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>