Hi all,
On Thu, 31 May 2018 09:32:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 06aeb9e3f2bc ("powerpc/kbuild: move -mprofile-kernel check to Kconfig")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> 250122baed29 ("powerpc64/module: Tighten detection of mcount call sites with -mprofile-kernel")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
> index 55bccc315e1a,f7667e2ebfcb..000000000000
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
> @@@ -462,9 -466,12 +466,12 @@@ static unsigned long stub_for_addr(cons
> return (unsigned long)&stubs[i];
> }
>
> -#ifdef CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> - static bool is_early_mcount_callsite(u32 *instruction)
> + static bool is_mprofile_mcount_callsite(const char *name, u32 *instruction)
> {
> + if (strcmp("_mcount", name))
> + return false;
> +
> /*
> * Check if this is one of the -mprofile-kernel sequences.
> */
This is now a conflict between the kbuild tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpyR8ySopLE6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
