Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I figured that since there were only a handful of users it wasn't a > popular API, also David very much knew of those patches changing it so > could easily have pulled in the special tip/sched/wait branch :/ I'm not sure I could, since I have to base on net-next. I'm not sure what DaveM's policy on that is. Also, it might've been better not to simply erase the atomic_t wait API immediately, but substitute wrappers for it to be removed one iteration hence. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
