On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:15:09PM CEST, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:270:27: error: 'struct cls_fl_filter' has no member named 'hw_dev'
> > cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev;
> This fix ("net/sched: cls_flower: Set egress_dev mark when calling into the HW driver")
> went to -net tree, should not go to -next. Apparently there is some mixup.
> DaveM?
The issue is that:
> > 7578d7b45ed870b1 ("net: sched: remove unused tcf_exts_get_dev helper and cls_flower->egress_dev")
> >both in the net-next tree. Falling back to previous net-next trees
> >introduced other issues so I reverted that commit for today.
the removal happened in the net-next tree, breaking the commit that was
previously introduced in the net tree (sorry, didn't notice that the
immediate commit was in there not net-next).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
