Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:15:09PM CEST, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Hi all, > >After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build >(x86_allmodconfig) failed like this: > >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c: In function 'fl_hw_destroy_filter': >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:208:12: error: 'struct tc_cls_flower_offload' has no member named 'egress_dev' > cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev; > ^ >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:208:27: error: 'struct cls_fl_filter' has no member named 'hw_dev' > cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev; > ^ >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c: In function 'fl_hw_update_stats': >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:270:12: error: 'struct tc_cls_flower_offload' has no member named 'egress_dev' > cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev; > ^ >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/net/sched/cls_flower.c:270:27: error: 'struct cls_fl_filter' has no member named 'hw_dev' > cls_flower.egress_dev = f->hw_dev != tp->q->dev_queue->dev; This fix ("net/sched: cls_flower: Set egress_dev mark when calling into the HW driver") went to -net tree, should not go to -next. Apparently there is some mixup. DaveM? > ^ >/home/broonie/tmpfs/next/scripts/Makefile.build:319: recipe for target 'net/sched/cls_flower.o' failed > >Caused by commit > > 7578d7b45ed870b13a8ace57e32feaed623c2a94 ("net/sched: cls_flower: Set egress_dev mark when calling into the HW driver") > >interacting with > > 7578d7b45ed870b1 ("net: sched: remove unused tcf_exts_get_dev helper and cls_flower->egress_dev") > >both in the net-next tree. Falling back to previous net-next trees >introduced other issues so I reverted that commit for today. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html