Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the arm-soc tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:05:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   9b7141d01a76 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Drop legacy board file for n900")
>>
>> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>>
>>   9132ce450bd1 ("ARM: omap2: fix missing include")
>>
>> from the gpio tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did that) and can
>> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
>> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
>> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
>> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
>> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> Since Linus (Torvalds) has merged the gpio tree, this conflict (and
> file removal) now affects the merge of the arm-soc tree).

Yup and I also informed him in my pull request about this conflict
so shouldn't be a problem.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux