On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:49:59PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:36:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 31.05.2016 17:25, Greg KH wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray > >> >>> <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>>> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style > >> >>>> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes the > >> >>>> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API, thus > >> >>>> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to. > >> > […] > >> >> Greg K-H, > >> >> > >> >> Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core; I > >> >> figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA bus > >> >> driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take). > >> > […] > >> > Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where the > >> > original series came from... > >> > >> Was this series merged or did it fell through the cracks? I currently > >> assume the latter, as I can't see it in neither mainline nor linux-next > >> (but maybe I'm missing something). Just wondering, because I have this > >> issue on my regression list for 4.7. > >> > >> For the whole context see: > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/ > >> > >> Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo) > > > >I don't think this is a regression, I was going to queue these up for > >4.8-rc1. As it is now, 4.7-rc is working just fine in this regards, > >right? > > > >Or am I missing something? > > The PC/104 drivers were changed to utilize the ISA bus driver as part of > the original patchset which attempted to decouple the X86_32 dependency > from the ISA Kconfig option; these drivers were updated with the > intention of building on X86_64 in addition to X86_32. > > However, the respective patches were merged without the decoupling > changes (since decoupling was the wrong approach), resulting in an > unintentional regression: the PC/104 drivers are now restricted to > X86_32 due to the ISA Kconfig option dependency, while they were capable > of building for X86_64 in previous kernel versions. > > This patchset should fix this regression by introducing the ISA_BUS_API > Kconfig option, and the respective Kconfig dependency changes for the > drivers, in order to allow them to build for both X86_64 and X86_32 as > originally capable. Ah, ok, that makes more sense, thanks. I'll go queue these up now. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
