On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray > ><vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style > >> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes the > >> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API, thus > >> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to. > >> > >> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >Or should I apply this directly to the GPIO tree? > > > >Yours, > >Linus Walleij > > Greg K-H, > > Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core; I > figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA bus > driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take). > > If possible, I'd like this patchset to find its way into one of the > coming release candidates in order to resolve the regression mentioned > in the cover letter: as of 4.7-rc1, the drivers which switched to > utilize the ISA bus driver are now restricted to X86_32 despite being > allowed in X86_64 in the 4.6 release. Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where the original series came from... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
