On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Xiong Zhou wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> Since tag next-20160407 in linux-next repo, executing binary
>> from/in DAX mount hangs.
>>
>> It does not hang if mount without dax option.
>> It hangs with both xfs and ext4.
>> It does not hang if execute from a -t tmpfs mount.
>> It does not hang on next-20160406 and still hangs on 0414 tree.
>>
>> # ps -axjf
>> ...
>> S+ 0 0:00 | \_ sh -x thl.sh
>> R+ 0 42:33 | \_ [hl]
>> ..
>> # cat thl.sh
>> mkfs.ext4 /dev/pmem0
>> mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /daxmnt
>> cp hl /daxmnt
>> /daxmnt/hl
>> # cat hl.c
>> void main()
>> {
>> printf("ok\n");
>> }
>> # cc hl.c -o hl
>>
>> Bisecting commits between 0406 and 0407 tag, points to this:
>>
>> d7c7d56ca61aec18e5e0cb3a64e50073c42195f7 is the first bad commit
>> commit d7c7d56ca61aec18e5e0cb3a64e50073c42195f7
>> Author: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu Apr 7 14:00:12 2016 +1000
>>
>> huge tmpfs: avoid premature exposure of new pagetable
>>
>> Bisect log and config are attatched.
>
> Excellent and very helpful bug report: thank you very much for taking
> the trouble to make such a good report.
>
> I see why this happens now: I've not been paying enough attention
> to the DAX changes.
>
> The fix requires a repositioning of where I allocate the new page
> table: which is a change we knew we had to make for other reasons,
> but it did not appear to be a high priority compared with other things
> - until your bug report showing that I have broken DAX rather badly.
>
> In return for your excellent bug report, I can immediately offer
> the most shameful patch I have ever posted: which has the virtue of
> simplicity, and will work so long as you have plenty of free memory;
> but might deadlock if it has to go into page reclaim (or maybe not:
> perhaps the DAXness would leave it as merely a lockdep violation).
>
> Maybe not so much worse than the current hang, but still shameful:
> I'm appending it here just in case you're in a hurry to see your "ok"
> program working on DAX; but I think I'd better rearrange priorities
> and try to provide a proper fix as soon as possible.
No hurry, :) Take your time.
>
> Never-to-be-Signed-off-by: an anonymous hacker
>
> --- 4.6-rc2-mm1/mm/memory.c 2016-04-10 10:12:06.167769232 -0700
> +++ linux/mm/memory.c 2016-04-15 00:54:06.427085026 -0700
> @@ -2874,7 +2874,7 @@ static int __do_fault(struct vm_area_str
> ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
> goto err;
> }
> -
> + out:
> /*
> * Use pte_alloc instead of pte_alloc_map, because we can't
> * run pte_offset_map on the pmd, if an huge pmd could
> @@ -2892,7 +2892,7 @@ static int __do_fault(struct vm_area_str
> ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> goto err;
> }
> - out:
> +
> *page = vmf.page;
> return ret;
> err:
Yes, "ok" is printed ok!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
