Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 11:31 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   net/ipv4/udp.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d894ba18d4e4 ("soreuseport: fix ordering for mixed v4/v6 sockets")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   ca065d0cf80f ("udp: no longer use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I tried to fixed it up (see below).  Unfortunately,
> hlist_add_tail_rcu() does not exist.  So instead I have reverted commit
> d894ba18d4e4 ("soreuseport: fix ordering for mixed v4/v6 sockets") for
> today.

Hi Stephen

Craig warned that this would happen indeed, and provided a net-next
patch, to help David with this conflict.

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/611093/

Thanks




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux