Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > It is now based on next-20150925.  As I have said before, you cannot
> > base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release.  You
> > should either base it on Linus' tree, or one of the other linux-next
> > included branches (as long as that other branch is never rebased).  
> 
> OK, now your tree is no longer based on a linux-next release (thanks).
> However, you have managed to rebase a whole string of post v4.3-rc5
> commits from Linus' tree into your tree.  This would mean that we would
> end up with duplicates of those patches.  Please just rebase your
> patches (and just your patches) onto some part of Linus' tree.

And now that you have merged in v4.3-rc6, just do a "git rebase
v4.3-rc6", please (you still have duplicates of some of the patches in
Linus' tree between -rc5 and -rc6.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux