Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yoshinori,

On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next.  This cannto work.
> > Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base).
> > 
> > I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from
> > linux-next until it is fixed.  Also, Linus cannot pull it in this state.
> 
> And now your tree conatins lots and lots of very old commits that do
> not even have Signed-off-by tags :-(.  The version I have been using
> has a HEAD of commit:
> 
> 99bcfda85f66 "Revert "asm-generic: {get,put}_user ptr argument evaluate only 1 time""
> 
> (which, it turns out" also has no Signed-off-by :-()
> 
> Maybe you should reset your tree to that and try to move on from there.

Can you please clean this up ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux