Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Fix a watchdog crash in some configurations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:44:57PM +0000, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> 
> > On May 5, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 04:17:07PM -0700, john.hubbard@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> Commit 8fcf2cc768acd845c1fed837bf9cfe2d7106336d in linux-next
> >> introduced a regression in some configurations. Specifically,
> >> with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL set, and CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL *not* set,
> >> the kernel will crash in lockup_detector_init(), due to a
> >> NULL tick_nohz_full_mask pointer.
> >> 
> >> This is because the above commit uses tick_nohz_full_mask
> >> (in lockup_detector_init), if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is set, but
> >> tick_nohz_full_mask only gets allocated if either:
> >> 
> >>    a) CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL is set, or
> >> 
> >>    b) Someone passes in nohz_full=<any_value> on the boot
> >>      args line.
> >> 
> >> To correct this, change lockup_detector_init so that it does
> >> a runtime check (in addition to the ifdef check). This now
> >> matches the way most of the other CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL code does
> >> it's checking. This fix is a little simpler than my original
> >> proposed fix, thanks to Chris Metcalf for that.
> > 
> > Hi Chris,
> > 
> > If you are ok with this, I can forward it along.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> 
> With the new dynamic test, we don't actually need the ifdef anymore. I asked John if he could respin it without that. 

Ok, I will wait for the respin. Thanks!

Cheers,
Don

> 
> > 
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> kernel/watchdog.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> >> index 40fda2f..910d73f 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> >> @@ -921,10 +921,14 @@ void __init lockup_detector_init(void)
> >>    set_sample_period();
> >> 
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> >> -    if (!cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> >> -        pr_info("Disabling watchdog on nohz_full cores by default\n");
> >> -    cpumask_andnot(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask,
> >> -               tick_nohz_full_mask);
> >> +    if (tick_nohz_full_enabled()) {
> >> +        if (!cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> >> +            pr_info("Disabling watchdog on nohz_full cores by default\n");
> >> +        cpumask_andnot(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask,
> >> +                   tick_nohz_full_mask);
> >> +    }
> >> +    else
> >> +        cpumask_copy(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
> >> #else
> >>    cpumask_copy(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
> >> #endif
> >> -- 
> >> 2.3.7
> >> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux