[PATCH] watchdog: Fix a watchdog crash in some configurations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>

Commit 8fcf2cc768acd845c1fed837bf9cfe2d7106336d in linux-next
introduced a regression in some configurations. Specifically,
with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL set, and CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL *not* set,
the kernel will crash in lockup_detector_init(), due to a
NULL tick_nohz_full_mask pointer.

This is because the above commit uses tick_nohz_full_mask
(in lockup_detector_init), if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is set, but
tick_nohz_full_mask only gets allocated if either:

    a) CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL is set, or

    b) Someone passes in nohz_full=<any_value> on the boot
      args line.

To correct this, change lockup_detector_init so that it does
a runtime check (in addition to the ifdef check). This now
matches the way most of the other CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL code does
it's checking. This fix is a little simpler than my original
proposed fix, thanks to Chris Metcalf for that.

Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/watchdog.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 40fda2f..910d73f 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -921,10 +921,14 @@ void __init lockup_detector_init(void)
 	set_sample_period();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
-	if (!cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
-		pr_info("Disabling watchdog on nohz_full cores by default\n");
-	cpumask_andnot(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask,
-		       tick_nohz_full_mask);
+	if (tick_nohz_full_enabled()) {
+		if (!cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
+			pr_info("Disabling watchdog on nohz_full cores by default\n");
+		cpumask_andnot(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask,
+			       tick_nohz_full_mask);
+	}
+	else
+		cpumask_copy(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
 #else
 	cpumask_copy(&watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
 #endif
-- 
2.3.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux