On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 02:43:02 PM Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06/18/14 23:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. > >> > >> Changes since 20140618: > >> > > > > on i386: > > > > CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled. > > > > CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_freeze': > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_target_system_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: error: 'ACPI_STATE_S3' undeclared (first use in this function) > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > CC net/dccp/qpolicy.o > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o] Error 1 > > Thanks for the report, we'll fix it. > > Can anyone explain why include/linux/acpi_bus.h has #ifdef > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP and conditional build for a dummy inline version of > acpi_target_system_state(), *but* that does not get included or used if > CONFIG_ACPI=n? Additionally, the combination of CONFIG_ACPI=y and > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n does not seem to work at all. These two things look like bugs to me. Most likely not tested thoruoughly enough. > So we'll really have to sprinkle #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI all over, instead of > neatly using the dummy versions that someone has gone through the > trouble of adding? No, we don't have to. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
