On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/18/14 23:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. >> >> Changes since 20140618: >> > > on i386: > > CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled. > > CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_freeze': > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_target_system_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: error: 'ACPI_STATE_S3' undeclared (first use in this function) > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > CC net/dccp/qpolicy.o > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o] Error 1 Thanks for the report, we'll fix it. Can anyone explain why include/linux/acpi_bus.h has #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP and conditional build for a dummy inline version of acpi_target_system_state(), *but* that does not get included or used if CONFIG_ACPI=n? Additionally, the combination of CONFIG_ACPI=y and CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n does not seem to work at all. So we'll really have to sprinkle #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI all over, instead of neatly using the dummy versions that someone has gone through the trouble of adding? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
