On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:49:52 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Paul Gortmaker >> <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 14-05-29 05:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> Patch 1 causes make;make to behave similarly to make if vdso2c fails. >> >> Patch 2 hopefully fixes x86 crossbuilds on big-endian machines. I don't >> >> have a big-endian machine to test on, though. >> > >> > Since the x86 builds are unconditionally failing as-is now in >> > linux-next, perhaps Stephen [Cc'd] can layer these on the top of >> > the tree he'll be making within the next couple of hours to give >> > them a big-endian test. > > I added them just after the merge of the tip tree today and will keep > them there until they (or somo other solution) turn up some other way. > >> Stephen, if you do this, could you also send me some of the build outputs: >> >> arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg >> arch/x86/vdso/*-image-*.c >> >> I'd like to verify that the output is correct. It would be >> unfortunate if the cross-built kernel had some subtle error. > > OK, I will send them in a separate email. For the benefit of the archives: the patches are bad. New ones coming. --Andy > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
