Hi Andy, On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:49:52 -0700 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Paul Gortmaker > <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14-05-29 05:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> Patch 1 causes make;make to behave similarly to make if vdso2c fails. > >> Patch 2 hopefully fixes x86 crossbuilds on big-endian machines. I don't > >> have a big-endian machine to test on, though. > > > > Since the x86 builds are unconditionally failing as-is now in > > linux-next, perhaps Stephen [Cc'd] can layer these on the top of > > the tree he'll be making within the next couple of hours to give > > them a big-endian test. I added them just after the merge of the tip tree today and will keep them there until they (or somo other solution) turn up some other way. > Stephen, if you do this, could you also send me some of the build outputs: > > arch/x86/vdso/*.so.dbg > arch/x86/vdso/*-image-*.c > > I'd like to verify that the output is correct. It would be > unfortunate if the cross-built kernel had some subtle error. OK, I will send them in a separate email. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
