Am 28.05.2014 15:38, schrieb Michael Welling:
> Looking at the Linux next version, I am fairly certian that the following is
> redundant checking:
> if (chips < 0) {
> dev_err(&spi->dev, "FATAL: invalid negative chip id\n");
> goto fail;
> }
>
> The chips variable should equal the number of bits in the spi_present_mask variable.
> Or am I missing something?
Can be left out. Was just a paranoid check, because with the missing
increment in the of path it became negative.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Stickel Tel. +49 4321 559 56-29
mycable GmbH Fax +49 4321 559 56-10
Gartenstrasse 10
24534 Neumuenster, Germany Email ms@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mycable GmbH, Managing Director: Michael Carstens-Behrens
USt-IdNr: DE 214 231 199, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 1797 NM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete all copies from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
