On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:00:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c between commit 99e4b98dbe3a ("gpio:
> mcp23s08: Bug fix of SPI device tree registration") from Linus' tree
> and commit 3e3bed913e8b ("gpio: mcp23s08: fixed count variable for
> devicetree probing") from the gpio tree.
>
> I fixed it up (one way - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> index 3d53fd6880d1,00fbb30b9b10..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> @@@ -894,11 -894,14 +894,12 @@@ static int mcp23s08_probe(struct spi_de
> dev_err(&spi->dev, "invalid spi-present-mask\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> +
> for (addr = 0; addr < ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->chip); addr++) {
> - if ((spi_present_mask & (1 << addr)))
> - chips++;
> pullups[addr] = 0;
> + if (spi_present_mask & (1 << addr))
> + chips++;
> }
> - if (!chips)
> - return -ENODEV;
> } else {
> type = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
> pdata = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev);
Looking at the Linux next version, I am fairly certian that the following is
redundant checking:
if (chips < 0) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "FATAL: invalid negative chip id\n");
goto fail;
}
The chips variable should equal the number of bits in the spi_present_mask variable.
Or am I missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
