----- Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道： > Hi, > > On Tue, 27 May 2014 13:07:30 +0800 (CST) Xuetao Guan <gxt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > ----- Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道： > > > Hi Chen, > > > > > > On Tue, 27 May 2014 09:23:38 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > I find some of patches are only Signed-of-by me, are they OK? > > > > > > Actually, this one is not OK. Anyone who handles a patch needs to add a > > > Signed-off-by. In the case below, that patch was commited to the tree > > > by Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, so there needs to be a > > > Signed-off-by from them as well. > > > > > > The same is true for all the commits in the unicore32 tree ... > > > > Ok, I see. > > > > Then, do I need to reply each mail with my sob? Or only replace acked-by by sob for all commits in my tree? > > You do not need to reply to each email, but any patch that you send on > to Linus (or someone else) needs to have your Signed-off-by. Please > read the "Developer's Certificate of Origin" in section 12 of > Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I see. What I misunderstood is that acked-by had similar functions. Thanks. Xuetao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
