On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:39:09 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:06:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:21:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > > Am 28.04.2014 19:17, schrieb Randy Dunlap: > > > > > > > > uml defconfig on x86_64: > > > > > > > > CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s > > > > In file included from include/linux/sem.h:5:0, > > > > from include/linux/sched.h:35, > > > > from arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2, > > > > from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h:257:20: error: static declaration of 'rcu_sysrq_start' follows non-static declaration > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h:250:6: note: previous declaration of 'rcu_sysrq_start' was here > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h:260:20: error: static declaration of 'rcu_sysrq_end' follows non-static declaration > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h:251:6: note: previous declaration of 'rcu_sysrq_end' was here > > > > make[2]: *** [arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please test your patch(es). > > > > Against exactly what? ;-) > > > > > Just in case, to build an x86_64 UML please run: > > > > > > make defconfig ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 > > > make linux ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 > > > > Hmmm.... Builds without errors in my local tree. > > > > Make a clone of linux-next... > > > > OK, now I get a different build failure: > > OK, my tiny brain just burst. Rik, I think I shall ease sysrq-rcu-ify-__handle_sysrq.patch sysrq-rcu-ify-__handle_sysrq-fix.patch and sysrqrcu-suppress-rcu-stall-warnings-while-sysrq-runs.patch into the bitbucket for now. Please resend everything when it's all sorted out? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
