On 04/25/14 13:44, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/25/14 07:04, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:40:29 -0700
>> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> uml on x86_64 defconfig:
>>>
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `__handle_sysrq':
>>> drivers/tty/sysrq.c:514: undefined reference to `rcu_sysrq_start'
>>> drivers/tty/sysrq.c:558: undefined reference to `rcu_sysrq_end'
>>
>> Randy, does the patch below fix it?
CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
tiny.c does not provide these functions... Paul...
> Hm, no, it does not. I'll look into it.
>
>> Mike, this patch should also address your concerns.
>>
>> Andrew, this can be a -fix patch for the sysctl-rcu patch,
>> assuming it fixes things :)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 1 +
>> kernel/rcu/update.c | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
>> index dd53af9..0867433 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
>> index 2ac3289..d22309c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
>> @@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ int rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check(void)
>>
>> void rcu_sysrq_start(void)
>> {
>> - rcu_cpu_stall_suppress = 2;
>> + if (!rcu_cpu_stall_suppress)
>> + rcu_cpu_stall_suppress = 2;
>> }
>>
>> void rcu_sysrq_end(void)
>>
>
>
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
