On 02/10/2014 08:02 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> +devicetree
>>
> [...]
>> In the DT node we have compatible ids for both. e.g. for omap4.dtsi
>>
>> usbhsehci: ehci@4a064c00 {
>> compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
>> reg = <0x4a064c00 0x400>;
>> interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> };
>>
>> Shouldn't ehci-omap driver be getting a higher priority than usb-ehci?
>>
>> A quick fix would be to eliminate "usb-ehci" from the DT node of all failing platforms.
>
> If the driver is not compatible with "usb-ehci", not sure why do we
> even state that in dts node?
>
>
I'm not sure either. Let's get rid of it.
Patch to fix the reported issue.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61204
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
