On 02/10/2014 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> +devicetree
>
[...]
> In the DT node we have compatible ids for both. e.g. for omap4.dtsi
>
> usbhsehci: ehci@4a064c00 {
> compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
> reg = <0x4a064c00 0x400>;
> interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> };
>
> Shouldn't ehci-omap driver be getting a higher priority than usb-ehci?
>
> A quick fix would be to eliminate "usb-ehci" from the DT node of all failing platforms.
If the driver is not compatible with "usb-ehci", not sure why do we
even state that in dts node?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
