On 11/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 11/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 11/08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> > > fs/anon_inodes.c between commit 24b0303e9532 ("take anon inode allocation
> > > to libfs.c") from the vfs tree and commit 02f3ac4386d9 ("anon_inodefs:
> > > forbid open via /proc") from the akpm-current tree.
> > >
> > > I just dropped the akpm-current changes for today - they should probably
> > > be applied to fs/libfs.c.
> >
> > Well, this probably means that
> >
> > anon_inodefs-forbid-open-via-proc.patch
> >
> > should be dropped. I'll rediff this patch against vfs.git
>
> 24b0303e9532 also removes anon_inode_fops. It seems that it was not really
> needed anyway, inode_init_always() does inode->i_fop = empty_fops...
>
> So probably we can simply change empty_fops but I need to recheck.
Well. It looks "really obvious" that any user of inode_init_always()
either needs to change ->i_fop or this file should not be opened via
/proc...
So, Al, feel free to ignore, this is minor. Still I think this patch
makes sense. Based on vfs.git#for-next.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
