On 11/08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> fs/anon_inodes.c between commit 24b0303e9532 ("take anon inode allocation
> to libfs.c") from the vfs tree and commit 02f3ac4386d9 ("anon_inodefs:
> forbid open via /proc") from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I just dropped the akpm-current changes for today - they should probably
> be applied to fs/libfs.c.
Well, this probably means that
anon_inodefs-forbid-open-via-proc.patch
should be dropped. I'll rediff this patch against vfs.git
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
