On 04/29/2013 02:28:07 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 04/29/13 10:59, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@xxxxxxx> > > The C++ compiler is more strict in that it refuses to assign > a void* to a struct list_head*.
Given that the code _isn't_ C++ (because C is not a subset of C++ but a separate langauge in its own right where "throw" is a legitimate variable name and so on), how is this an issue?
Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html