On 04/29/13 13:05, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130426: >> > > > (who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) > > > on x86_64: > > warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) > > because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. > > > Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? > > and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, > which does not exist. Please add the file. Oops, sorry, I looked in the wrong place for that file, which DOES exist. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
