On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > > >> Can you please move the definition of sparc_idle to processor_32.h > >> It is sparc32 specific - and then we do not need the __ASSEMBLY__ guards > >> as the sparc32 variant are not used from assembler. > > > > sure, let me know if attached works. > > ugh, not accustomed to sending patches via thunderbird. > hopefully this attachment works... > > >From 358ca5d7e02c4559ad3fbf8135421e4a3753e979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:27:26 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] sparc idle: rename pm_idle to sparc_idle > Reply-To: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center > > (pm_idle)() is being removed from linux/pm.h > because Linux does not have such a cross-architecture concept. > > sparc uses an idle function pointer in its architecture > specific code. So we re-name sparc use of pm_idle to sparc_idle. > > Maybe some day, SPARC will cut over to cpuidle... > > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Build tested - OK. Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
