Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h
> > index 34baa35..622cfa5 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #define nop() 		__asm__ __volatile__ ("nop")
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >  extern void (*sparc_idle)(void);
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  #endif
> > 
> 
> Thank you Stephen!
> 
> The last time I compiled a sparc kernel was in 1993:-)
> 
> I've added your fix and Dave's Ack to this patch,
> and updated it in my next branch.

Hi Len.

Can you please move the definition of sparc_idle to processor_32.h
It is sparc32 specific - and then we do not need the __ASSEMBLY__ guards
as the sparc32 variant are not used from assembler.

Do you btw. have any hints how I can convert to the cpu_idle thing you hinted?

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux