On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:31:01AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/16/2013 11:02 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:49:05AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 01/11/2013 01:45 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Laurent Pinchart > >>> <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I've sent several patch series for the SH PFC (Pin Function Controller) to the > >>>> linux-sh mailing list. One of the series included pinctrl core patches for > >>>> easier testing, but I made it clear that they should *not* be pushed to > >>>> mainline through the SH tree. > >>> > >>> No big deal, what fun is linux-next if we don't break it ;-) > >> > >> Hmm. It's causing a lot of engineers here a lot of trouble, since they > >> all see linux-next won't boot, and haven't been paying enough attention > >> to know which commit to revert:-(. Lots of lost productivity:-( > >> > >> Simon, the offending commit: > >> > >> 6d3ef6b drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core > >> > >> is still in next-20130116. Can you please remove it? > > > > I removed the commit yesterday. > > Please let me know if it seems to be lingering. > > Thanks. I believe it's gone from next-20130117, judging by a quick > search through "git log" at least. Thanks and sorry for the mess. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
