Hi Simon, On Friday 11 January 2013 21:12:43 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 12/12/2012 01:25 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This makes the device core auto-grab the pinctrl handle and set > >> the "default" (PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT) state for every device > >> that is present in the device model right before probe. This will > >> account for the lion's share of embedded silicon devcies. > > > > There are quite a few problems with this patch, and they end up > > completely breaking at least Tegra in next-20130110. > > But I have not put this patch into linux-next. > > I was still waiting for Greg to ACK it... > > Apparently it was included in a pull request to the SH tree or something, > Simon can you remove these patches for now, this patch needs to > be elaborated on in the pinctrl tree first. I've sent several patch series for the SH PFC (Pin Function Controller) to the linux-sh mailing list. One of the series included pinctrl core patches for easier testing, but I made it clear that they should *not* be pushed to mainline through the SH tree. Actually the whole PFC series have been found out today by Guennadi Liakhovetski to be buggy. I will fix the problems and send a new version. In the meantime the pinmux-pinctrl and pinmux-dt series should not be pushed to mainline. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
