On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/12 9:39 PM >>> > >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/12 4:28 PM >>> > >> >Evidently we need to change your new test in > >> >drivers/usb/early/ehci-dbgp.c to: > >> > > >> >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HCD_EHCI) || defined(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST) > >> > > >> >Upcoming changes to ehci-hcd will make this unnecessary in 3.8, but for > >> >now we need it. > >> > >> Which tells me that the CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT version would have been > >> the better one (and I would favor that over the ugly variant you suggest > >> above). > > > >I also suggested IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB), which is no uglier than what > >you submitted and would also fix this build error. How about using it > >instead? > > Yes, that's better. Question then is - updated original patch or incremental one? Greg will probably want an incremental patch, because the original has already been merged. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
