>>> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/12 9:39 PM >>> >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/12 4:28 PM >>> >> >Evidently we need to change your new test in >> >drivers/usb/early/ehci-dbgp.c to: >> > >> >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HCD_EHCI) || defined(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST) >> > >> >Upcoming changes to ehci-hcd will make this unnecessary in 3.8, but for >> >now we need it. >> >> Which tells me that the CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT version would have been >> the better one (and I would favor that over the ugly variant you suggest >> above). > >I also suggested IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB), which is no uglier than what >you submitted and would also fix this build error. How about using it >instead? Yes, that's better. Question then is - updated original patch or incremental one? Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
