On 21/05/12 09:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Lee,
On Mon, 21 May 2012 09:08:56 +0100 Lee Jones<lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The patch itself has had extensive build and run testing, with DT both
enabled and disabled. I'm guessing some other changes may be having and
influence here. I'm happy to take a look for you. Can you tell me where
I can pull the offending branch from please?
The mfd tree can be found here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-2.6.git#for-next
Did you try building it for X86_64? What failed for me was an x86_64
allmodconfig.
That seems broken to me.
Why would any of the X86_64 systems be building ab8500-core code?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
