On Mon, March 26, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups > > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:42 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:23 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/96215 > > > > > And this seems to be linux-next. > > > > > Mark, Is this part of the sound updates that went to Linus? > > > > No, not yet - it was only sent after the merge window. Quite why > nobody > > managed to notice it before then I don't know. It'll go to him soon, > or > > at least to Takashi, but don't know if it'll make -rc1 or not. > I should have noticed that sound needs update as well :( > > Now either I drop these from 3.4 or merge Linus's tree and apply > Alexandre's fix (as that is the right fix rather than one in asoc tree) > And since this was required for RIO patches which are still WIP, I > think > I am leaning towards former. > I do not see any sense in dropping these API changes now. Some audio files have been missed form the original patch because I did not have them in the code tree when patch was built. For those who was not in the list for original patches here is a link to the patch details: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/373 If we drop the API changes now we will need redo these changes again later. We already dragged these changes long enough since original discussion in October. I will send new inline wrapper for RapidIO today. Alex. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
