On 03/26/2012 03:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 07:59:44PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: >> As to longer term, I am happy to work up something that will spot this >> particular kind of failure (symbol changes type) and output something >> more useful during the kallsyms generation if you would like. >> >> Are you planning to pull in either of the fixes you mention? > > I'm not, because those are all sub-optimal - I don't see why we should > bloat the kernel image just for the sake of working around kallsyms. > > The best I've come up with so far which avoids that is to force > KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS to always be set on ARM. Or just increasing the base number of kallsyms runs on ARM? That way, you can have a real extra extra pass in the case of something else :) Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
